It looks like a more affordable take on the $ 3,500 Vision Pro sundry - reality headset has taken a backseat at Apple . In January this class , The Informationreported that a lower - price version with toned - down innards could make it in 2025 .

Now , famous supply chain analyst Ming - Chi Kuo lay claim that thepocket - friendly headsetwon’t be strike the shelves within the next three old age . “ As I understand it , production of the cheaper Vision Pro has been hold up beyond 2027 for a while now , ” Kuowroteon X.

consort toBloomberg , plans to finally introduce a lower - priced theoretical account were in place even before the Vision Pro was launched . The caller was hoping to bring this random variable — currently in maturation under the codename N107 — to the marketplace by the end of 2025 .

Apple was reportedly eye a price tag in the ballpark of $ 1,500 to $ 2,000 for the watered - down form , which would supposedly skip feature like the EyeSight display and might embrace lower - resolution showing units .

However , the Vision Pro ’s lukewarm reception is part due to a lack of a killer use case . Kuo ’s latest update also divvy up standardized apprehensions . “ I think what really push back Apple to delay the cheaper Vision Pro is that just reducing the price would n’t help create successful use cases , ” he notes .

Notably , Kuo also mentions that Apple could fill the gap in the product launching window with an updated Vision Pro example that would employ the next - gen M5 silicon . The current looping relies on the 8 - core group M2 processor and an R1 Centennial State - C.P.U. .

Responding to a user query underneath the same Wiley Post , Kuo further iterates that what Apple considers an affordable take on the Vision Pro might still be too pricey when compare to the competition . That position quo becomes even more challenging from an adoption perspective , consider the niche software program ecosystem for the headset .

Looking over at the diligence in general , gaming continues to be the big gadget driver in the field of extend world ( XR ) wearables , but the mainstream products are far more low-cost . Take a look at theMeta Quest 3S , which starts at $ 300 , while the Quest 3 goes for around $ 500 and often acquire discount .

Theflagship Quest Pro , on the other hand , comes with a prickle price of $ 1,000 . Then we have the continued popularity of smart glasses design , where role player like Xreal , RayNeo , and Viture have school a solid lover base focalize mostly on content consumption and gaming .

As far as the more advance VR and VR applications go , both Meta and Snap have recently showcased their next - gen visual modality for the class . Google and Samsung are also exploit on their various chic glasses , with Qualcomm as the silicon supplier , according toCNBC .

Apple has yet to comment officially on its smart shabu ambition , though rumors suggest the company is eye that goal in the long term . But until those heart murmur materialize , Apple ’s XR plans hinge on the achiever of the headset design with the Vision line . Only time will tell whether Apple can issue as a central actor or squander the lead to other player .