TheApple Watch Series 10is one of my pet wearables , as it offers the biggest display AND the thin build in an Apple Watch to engagement . stamp battery life away , which is much worse than both theApple Watch Ultra 2and theGoogle Pixel Watch 3 , it ’s the skilful Apple Watch I ’ve ever used .
The Apple Watch total with a legion of features for track your physical fitness , include automatonlike detection of many different type of workouts , but the trailing of vital planetary house is n’t the most accurate . The Pixel Watch 3 solves this problem with the practiced sum rate trailing I ’ve tried on a smartwatch , but it does n’t have as many workout option as the Apple Watch , and automatic detection is inferior as well .
Both smartwatches only work with one mobile platform , but if you ’re platform - agnostical and want something to track your fitness , which one should you grease one’s palms ? I took to the streets of Dubai on a recent vacation to reply this interrogation . Here ’s how they compared on a recent one - international mile walk .
Both failed to detect the first walk
My original plan had been to take the air to the center and back ( 0.8 miles full , according to Google Maps ) , but this plan fell apart when neither watch observe the walk of life after 0.2 miles . That ’s half the space one - way , and while I ’ve had this concern with the Pixel Watch 3 before , the deficiency of spotting on the Apple Watch was a real surprisal .
Once I get to the plaza . I manually activate the manner of walking visibility on both devices . It ’s deserving mention here that the Pixel Watch 3 has a single walking workout option , while the Apple Watch Series 10 has both indoor and outdoor walk options . I picked the indoor choice as I was indoors , but this means it was n’t trying to represent my GPS itinerary , whereas the Pixel Watch 3 was .
A few laps of the mall brought me to 0.6 miles on my pedometer , with the Apple Watch Series 10 tracking dispirited at 0.49 miles and the Pixel Watch 3 much higher at 0.74 miles .
Exploring the walk test data
The delta in the tracking of aloofness continued throughout . I ’ve noticed before that the Pixel Watch 3 often tracks a longer distance , while the Apple Watch is usually slightly under . Each smartwatch utilise algorithms and sensor to determine what apparent movement to count and cut , and each troupe still has some adjustments to make to be truly accurate .
At the end of the psychometric test , my total aloofness walk was 1.02 miles . The Pixel Watch 3 clocked in at 1.16 Roman mile , while the Apple Watch Series 10 was at 0.95 mile . The Apple Watch Series 10 was technically more accurate , while I consider the Pixel Watch cover for low movements .
Beyond just distance , there was a disparity in the presumed calories burned . The Pixel Watch 3 say I bite 245 small calorie , while the Apple Watch Series 10 tracked this at just under 100 calories . Apple has a deal more historical data on me than Google does — both over several geezerhood and in late weeks — and based on how I felt during the walk , the Apple Watch Series 10 feel more accurate in price of data .
Diving into the heart rate data
As I mention , I enjoy the Pixel Watch 3 for its core rate trailing . Throughout multiple trial run over the past few months , it ’s been more accurate than most wearables I ’ve tested , and I ’m more disposed to think its heart charge per unit stats over those of the competition . However , the Fitbit app makes it difficult to locate raw heart charge per unit data after the workout , so the information below is anecdotally based on watch the Pixel Watch 3 during the walk .
According to the Pixel Watch , my heart rate fluctuate between 90 meter per mo ( metronome marking ) and 105 , while the Apple Watch Series 10 mostly tracked it at 101 beats per minute . In the final results , the Pixel Watch 3 does n’t exhibit average gist charge per unit datum , and instead focalize on a cardio payload factor of 4 , while the Apple Watch Series 10 exhibit an guess workout elbow grease score of 4 and an average substance rate of 94 bpm .
It ’s worth noting the key difference between the two regarding heart rate tracking : the Pixel Watch 3 is design to appraise your heart rate once per second throughout the Clarence Day , even at rest . Comparatively , the Apple Watch only update every five minutes except in exercising mode .
While the Pixel Watch 3 is more accurate at continuous heart rate monitoring than the Apple Watch , neither compare to wear a dedicated heart rate monitor from Polar or a more fitness - focused gadget from ship’s company like Garmin .
Key takeaways from the full experience
Beyond just heart rate , this mental test revealed a few other thing . If you like to mix indoor and outdoor workouts , the Pixel Watch 3 is far better with its individual profile , as starting an indoor walk on the Apple Watch Series 10 and then going alfresco does n’t enable GPS tracking . That tell , Apple displays the information in a more friendly and straightforward way than Google / Fitbit does .
The Fitbit app also takes much longer than the Apple Watch Series 10 to track and refresh your data , and if you ’re newfangled to Fitbit , the app ’s layout is quite confusing . In especial , to get at physical exertion data , you need to go to the Today tab , then Exercise Days , and tap on each workout . It ’s only a few tap , but I find far less visceral than it should be , and it ’s confusing to the spot that even I had to double over - check how to enter the sum-up report . It ’s also frustrating that you ca n’t access this data from the watch , but demand to utilise the phone itself .
I also wish the Fitbit app would ply accession to more granular data point . Cardio Load and Target Load are first-class ways to avail mean customers become more fit every twenty-four hour period , but the lack of gritty warmheartedness data makes it less useful for those who require this additional information .
Which smartwatch is better for tracking workouts?
I was quite surprised by the deficiency of automatic exercise sleuthing on both devices . Each claims to mechanically get over your physical exercise , but neither activated the mode as I set off on my initial walk to the mall . While I expected this from the Pixel Watch 3 , the Apple Watch Series 10 not prompting to track the exercising was more surprising , given that Apple normally prompts fairly quickly .
Both wearables cover a peachy amount of data point , but there ’s a noticeable dispute in how it ’s displayed later . The Fitbit app urinate it difficult to access raw , data but is far more friendly for average user , while Apple Health lays out data in a drug user - favorable way that allows you to get at as much or as lilliputian data as you like .
The on - equipment experience is pretty similar between the two . Still , while I ’m impressed with the Pixel Watch 3 ’s heart rate accuracy and cardio freight feature , the deficiency of grainy inside information means I ’m more inclined to keep using the Apple Watch Series 10 to trail all my physical exercise .
