Smart rings have fast become one of the hot grocery store in the wearable technology market place . For many years , Oura was the leader and the only tangible maker of fresh gang that appealed to most people . Then come a myriad of other option , including halo fromRingConn , Ultrahuman , Circular , and , most importantly , Samsung ’s first smart ring .
TheSamsung Galaxy Ringtakes a unlike approach to the competition . Built around the Samsung Health ecosystem , it is designed to be a companion to the Galaxy Watch batting order . It has a much simpler hardening of features than other saucy rings , which focus on packing as much technology into the ring as potential .
new off a legion of Modern competition , Oura unveil its latest rival into the market . TheOura Ring 4brought a redesign of both hardware and software and is designed to help Oura retain its placement as thebest smart ringon the food market . I had the previous genesis , have used the current multiplication Oura for almost two month , and have also used theGalaxy Ringsince it launched in July . After weeks of using these side - by - side , there are many reasons to prefer one over the other , but deciding which to corrupt is n’t as straightforward as it may seem . In the battle of theOura Ring 4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ring , this is the one I ’d pick .
There are few differences in comfort and design
Had I written this before the Oura Ring 4 was launched , it would have been no contest : Samsung would have make headway the design / comfort competition . However , the redesign Oura Ring 4 solves many of the job with the previous generation and makes this a much skinny contest .
Both ring focalise on being as thin and loose as possible , but the Oura Ring 4 is still slightly impenetrable and thicker than the Galaxy Ring . I expected this would make a big departure for me , especially as I struggle with egotistic fingers after a heart attack . However , it turns out that the Oura Ring 4 is just as comfortable as the Galaxy Ring .
Oura did n’t use a concave pattern like Samsung , so one of my big headache with the Oura Ring 3 could still exist : the overall durability . I have the Oura Ring 3 in a lusterlessness stealth color , and after three years , it has shown a lot of wear and rip . My Oura Ring 4 is matte silver , which should help hide any blemishes , but I would be concerned about pick out one of the other colors .
The Galaxy Ring uses a concave design , which has a couple of fundamental benefit . First , the design cause it more comfortable if you have swollen digit , although the differences are now minimal between it and the Oura Ring 4 . Second , Samsung confirmed that the key reason for choosing the concave design was to minimize the open orbit that is outwards present , and this means it ’s far less probable to draw — and show — general article of clothing and split . That said , it still has diminished bumps on the interior of the halo that house the sensor , while Oura has go for a bump - less next - generation desegregate sensor design .
I fully expected to still choose the Galaxy Ring , but these two are neck - and - neck . Neither has a pregnant advantage in terms of pattern , which is a big improvement over the Oura Ring 3 vs. Galaxy Ring competition that Samsung succeed well .
The Oura Ring 4 is better for diving deeper into your health
When you consider the feature set of both ring , it ’s no competition ; the Oura Ring 4 offers almost everything you may attain from have both a Galaxy Ring and Galaxy Watch but in just one twist .
The Galaxy Ring , by comparison , has a more limited feature curing . It tracks sure workouts automatically , immortalize the data , and synchronise it to your phone , all without you needing to do anything . There are specific workouts that it can track — a list that ’s shorter than the competition — and it is n’t the most ideal when it comes to tracking strength and exercising weight training .
It ’s built for convenience and perfect as the first smart ring for most drug user , but it decrease scant when looking for more advance datum . There ’s no gyroscope or GPS , which means it wo n’t accurately track your runnel , although I ’m not a runner , so this does n’t impact me as much . For my purposes , it ’s perfectly up to , but for many people , it may accrue short of cross all your workouts .
The Oura Ring 4 has a overplus of workout and health - tracking feature but also devolve short when it comes to provide detailed track or workout data . There are double the neural pathways for tracking health data , and it ’s proven to be more exact than the Galaxy Ring at accurately get over health and heart data . The latter is critical for my pauperism , and the redesigned Oura Ring app also makes it super commodious to dive into the data .
Additionally , the Oura Ring 4 is more accurate at tag pedigree - oxygen data , although both have proven less exact than a dedicated pulse oximeter . I enjoy using the Galaxy Ring because it ’s round-eyed , but the data point provided by the Oura Ring 4 means it ’s been a lasting fixture on my finger , at least when I remember to charge it .
Samsung is the endurance and convenience champion
The Galaxy Ring is also a nigh - omnipresent secureness on my finger’s breadth for one cardinal ground : the battery lasts significantly longer than the Oura Ring 4 , and the portable carrying case make it so much easier to charge and carry . As such , the Galaxy Ring is better for people who desire a simpler overall experience .
The Galaxy Ring survive up to nine day on a undivided charge , and the carrying case can hold up to two full charges . With a fully charged ring and instance , you could expect around 24 day of total shelling life , making this the idealistic solution if you ’re planning an drawn-out vacation .
Meanwhile , the Oura Ring 4 falls considerably brusque , and having gotten used to the Galaxy Ring ’s endurance , the Oura Ring 4 battery lifetime frustrates me . It ’s much shortsighted and lasts around seven days on a single heraldic bearing . More importantly , there ’s no portable charger , so you must acquit the charging puck with you . The deficiency of envelopment have it less than idealistic for protect your gang while not wear down it .
Oura missed a heavy opportunity to take after Samsung and RingConn in building a charging cause , and considering the overall economic value for money , it is much voiceless to recommend Oura Ring 4 . This is especially true deal the RingConn Gen 2 has most of the same features , offers 12 years of battery life , and comes with a carrying face that can extend the battery by up to 150 days .
The Oura Ring 4 is more expensive but more compatible
Where Samsung got thing correct with the Galaxy Ring is the value - for - money oblation . Yes , it does less than the Oura Ring 4 , but it ’s more than suited for most mass and does n’t have a subscription cost attached . bear once , and it ’s yours forever . The only trouble is that it ’s only compatible with Android , although , as I found , it does n’t matter which Android telephone you use .
The Oura Ring 4 takes a dissimilar approach . There ’s an upfront monetary value like the Galaxy Ring , but to make the most of the full suite of features , you also involve an Oura rank . This will cost you $ 6 per month or $ 70 per year , and while it works without the membership , this subscription allow you to use the full cortege of feature film . However , there ’s a fundamental benefit to the Oura Ring 4 : It also act with the iPhone .
This is the smart ring that I would pick
As I was writing this , I seem down at my hand and realized that while I thought I had been wear the Oura Ring 4 , I had been wearing the Galaxy Ring . This is the stiff indication of how similar these two smart rings are , at least in size of it and weight .
For some people — specially those that use an Android phone — the Galaxy Ring is a better selection , simply because there are no ongoing costs , and it works specially well if you also have a Galaxy Watch . However , if you ’re an iPhone user or you want the largest set of data in a standalone smart ring , look no further than the Oura Ring 4 .
give-up the ghost fore , I plan to use the Oura Ring 4 , mainly because it works with any machine that I switch to . I use both an iPhone and an Android telephone set daily , and the Galaxy Ring is particularly challenging to move to a new phone . The Oura Ring 4 is far simple and has better overall metrics . Thanks to my lifetime membership ( from upgrading from Oura Ring 2 to 3 ) , I do n’t need to pay off for the subscription . I just wish there was a portable charging grammatical case , and there ’s a warm probability I ’ll return to the Galaxy Ring before long just for this convenience . Before that , however , I plan to try theRingConn Gen 2 , especially as we extremely recommend it .
One thing is clear : whichever of these two smart rings you determine to buy , you ’ll be getting an incredible machine up to of cut across all the important data during the day and while you kip . But if you could stomach the subscription monetary value and do n’t mind the scant battery life , the Oura Ring 4 is the way to go .
