I ’ve been promise this Hisense 110 UX reviewsince I first saw the television at CESat the beginning of the year . It ’s been a long wait . But now that it ’s here … the postponement was worth it .
The Hisense 110 UX is almost unrivaled when it comes to the total experience . Projectors do n’t quite equalize it . Micro - LED does n’t quite meet it . The only other telecasting you’re able to buy that really competes — at this size , anyway — is the115 - inch TCL QM89 , and we ’ll get to that .
In a way , that this is only one of two consumer telecasting you may buy in the well - over-100 - inch size class could make the job a little loose , right ? If the 110 UX does n’t perform as well as a reference - grade idiot box in a smaller size of it , it should n’t be disgraceful . This is new territory , so we expect first - gen problem . And if you want a TV this fully grown ? Well , this is what you get .
That ’s one way of expect at it .
The other way of looking at it : This TV costs just shy of $ 20,000 , and that form of money should corrupt you more than just size . It should buy you top - tier performance , too .
I went into this reassessment prepared to be a little forgiving . But it move around out I did n’t have to be , because this TV is one Hades of a performer . I keep looking for a smoke gun against it , and I ca n’t find one .
It does n’t get everything right . There ’s for certain elbow room for melioration , at least if you ’re a purist with super - in high spirits standard . But if you ’re go to expend a small fortune on a TV ? The 110 UX — you ’ll also see it referred to as the Championship Edition with an NBA tie-in - in — is the best argument in favor of that move that I ’ve see yet . Not only that , but this TV is a readable signaling that Hisense has the processing chop shot to go toe - to - toe with the best in the business , which is not something I ’ve been able to say before .
And when this processing technology trickles down to TVs like the Hisense U8 series ? watch out out .
I ’m getting a little forward of myself , though . allow ’s start out by talking about all the non - picture timber thoughtfulness .
Hisense 110 UX specs
Big and glossy
The 110 UX is a bountiful TV . And it is wakeless . Yes , it can be safely mount on your wall , but ensure a professional does it . That mode , if anything happens , it ’s on them — not you — and you ’re covered .
Surprisingly , this TV has a step that allow it to be position on larger media cabinets . From the outside border of one foot to the other , you ’re looking at 44 inches , which is not far off from the spacing I see on many 65 - column inch TVs .
believe this , though : Placing this television on a media cabinet intend the top border of the TV likely will be over 7 infantry eminent . That intend when you ’re seated , you ’ll have to tilt your Kuki up a bit . It ’s a little like sitting in one of the front row of a movie theatre . This is something I did n’t comment about the TCL 115 - inch because we have that tv set on floor stand , so the center of the tv set is much closer to oculus - level when seated .
Next : the sieve is glossy . A lot of folks are run to prefer that — it really does give the image a bite more lustre . However , anyone hop this is the ultimate bright - way telecasting should plausibly temper their expectation a bit . Sure , the TV can get more than lustrous enough to do battle with a sunlight - soaked room . But bright loose sources are reflected with more intensity here than with a TV that has a more strong-growing anti - glare coating .
If I had to guess , I ’d say Hisense went with what would count good in a dark way , figuring this TV is more probable to land in a consecrate media space than a traditional living room . It ’s heavy to tail points for the glossy screen , but I palpate I must since even dimmer sconce lighting is going to be a little distracting when watching dark movie scenes .
Now , a quick parole on the user user interface . This TV runsGoogle TVbetter than any other Hisense TV I ’ve ever screen , so it gets two ovolo up from me there .
Big bass and big feel, but …
When it comes to the audio system , I wish my takeout food was a bit more overconfident . Hisense clearly made audio performance a precedency , because it had to know these side - mounted speakers were operate to be polarizing . To Hisense ’s credit , it made the speaker as stealthy as they could be . And I acclaim Hisense for not call it in with down - fire speakers .
On the positive side , I will say this idiot box does make a significant amount of bass , which can at times give the TV a very heavy feel . Also , I appreciate the stereo effects this TV produce — the blanket positioning of the speakers makes them all the more convincing .
However , my congratulations ends there . Despite Hisense ’s efforts , I ’m just not a fan of how this TV sounds . I know most common people who purchase this TV will belike also invest in an evenly impressive audio organization . But these polarizing side speakers were a gamble that just does n’t give off .
It hardly seems bonny to Hisense , as I ’m sure there would be complaints either elbow room , correct ? It ’s kind of a lose - lose spot . If they had n’t put this much exertion into the audio organization , we ’d complain that a TV this expensive should have had more effort put into the sound . But with these speakers , I feel like they really needed to bowl me over — and they just do n’t .
When I fire up this TV , I just at once wish I had a soundbar running . There ’s a big hole in the frequency answer somewhere , and the fidelity is just not what I want . Any practical surroundings sound , including Atmos impression , is just nonexistent . ( Your fuel consumption rate , as always , may vary . )
For the ‘Nit Nerds’
While it sounds like I ’ve take off out disconfirming , it just so happens that most of my complaints are around non - picture quality element . Because the showing experience this idiot box offers is delightfully excellent .
For all you Nit Nerds out there , I have some shocking routine to share . But I have to preempt these numbers with a caveat : Over the past few twelvemonth , as we ’ve been chase down the dear HDR public presentation from TVs , we ’ve been rouse about high heyday brightness numbers because not only do we desire dazzling HDR highlight when watching HDR , but we also enjoy a overnice , bright , vivid telecasting when determine SDR content in brighter rooms .
However , the obsession over peak brightness mensuration has , for me , gotten a little out of hand . And I realize the caustic remark of saying that when I ’ve nickname a community “ Nit Nerds . ” For sure , I ’ve been part of the ballyhoo geartrain that some manufacturer have feed into .
But I need to explain first and foremost that the peak brightness numbers I got from this TV are , in many ways , kind of a party trick . What ’s more important than the numbers is what the image really looks like when viewing message .
I measured this television set using the filmmaker manner picture preset in both SDR and HDR . And for Dolby Vision , I used mainly Dolby Vision Dark — though I did diddle with the higher APL Dolby Vision Custom modal value , which I tweaked to have the right colour temperature while also invalid all move smoothing .
In SDR Filmmaker Mode , with the default brightness setting of just 20 out of 100 , I appraise bloom brightness of about 680 nit , which is higher than the SDR touchstone , but more to the liking of most viewer . When I dislodge the light typeset up to 45 , I got 1650 nit , and when I maxed it out at 100 , I got a hot 3,700 nits — and with a standard 10 % window , by the way .
The livid balance is a second off , with the red channel a little high . But , those readings change after the television receiver had been in surgery for about 5 minutes . When I went back and reran those measurements , the snowy remainder decide into fantabulous operation , with delta errors of less than 3 across the integrality of the metrical grayscale . This is excellent execution regard no standardisation was execute — and I ’d hoped for that from such an expensive television set . To make certain this was n’t a fluke I remeasured several times , and when the TV had been in operation for about five second , those measuring hold reliable . So , I guess the idiot box needs a little lovesome - up time until it ’s at its most accurate .
meet a number like 18,000 nits is mad .
colour gamut execution was very good , with delta misplay of less than 3 , and the color checker mental test came out really well , too , with most errors under 3 . That ’s not reference quality , but it ’s in the same ballpark as some of the best tv ( before standardisation ) on the market .
Switching to HDR is where things get really interesting . First , there ’s only one real negative I have to call attention to : This TV overly brighten everything . It go after well above standard on the electro - optical transfer social occasion ( EOTF ) test . This would be all right if it was the result in anything other than the Filmmaker Mode . But Filmmaker Mode is meant to be the most accurate manner , and this is not correct . Will most people enjoy it ? I ’d reason they will . But it is not correct for Filmmaker Mode , and I ’d like to see Hisense bushel this .
Here ’s a impact I was n’t quick for : Peak brightness with a 10 % window was 4,200 nits . Impressive , but not unexpected from a goggle box that claim up to 10,000 nits peak brightness for HDR highlights . I reduced the window size of it to 5 % and the 110 UX started at 10,000 nits , pushed up to 13,000 nit , and then dropped — which is typical . TVs can only do this radical - high luminance hooey in small areas for short full point of time .
I boil down the test window to 2 % and the television set come in at a roaring 18,000 nits before return off after a match of seconds .
The meter I utilise is only rated to be exact to 10,000 nits , though I know it can interpret higher than that . I consider the margin for error could be in the hundreds — not 1000 , though — so seeing a number like 18,000 nit is insane .
It ’s significant to note that you are never going to get 18,000 or even 15,000 nits from this telly in real performance . Most HDR is mastered to 1,000 nit and does n’t have information directing the television set to go over that issue . There is a handful of mental object dominate to 4,000 nit , and no doubt this TV can do that without blinking . There is virtually no content you could get at that is get the hang at 10,000 nits — so this TV will never be called to do any high than that . However , if you turn on Dynamic Tone Mapping , this TV will promote HDR high spot as hard as it can , and it ’s kind of bonkers just how brilliant this TV can get .
One last note : perceive brightness does n’t have a additive relationship to the measurement . Double the nits is nowhere cheeseparing to double the luminance . So the difference of opinion between 10,000 nit and 18,000 nit is not virtually as much as you ’d think . But the whimsy that this is the brightest TV I ’ve ever tested ? Well , there ’s no doubt about that .
Color, motion, and upscaling
Moving away from peak smartness measurements , the 110 UX perform laudably with colour , testify marginal deviations from the standard when luminance errors are factored in . Rec . 2020 color gamut coverage came in at 83 % — we ’re used to consider about 76 % for context — and the TV did about 99 % of DCI - P3 coverage .
The television measures extremely well before standardization .
Overall , the TV measures extremely well before calibration , and Hisense score the tools available to dial it in to near ne plus ultra .
Outside of those measurements , I continue to get owing result . I put this TV through a gauntlet of torture tests , and the 110 UX did extremely well with all of them — in some ways outstrip some of the best - rank TVs on the market .
When it derive to movement , I was downright impressed . Due to the very quick reply time on this TV , I see a little snatch of flashing from smart objects during dense photographic camera pan , but it ’s nowhere well-nigh as noticeable as it is with OLED . I have not had a job with photographic film judder or dropped frames on this television , and I have keep an eye on a lot of content .
For upscaling and cleanup of low-spirited - quality mental object , this is the best I ’ve ever visualise from Hisense . I ca n’t find any reason to complain . This video far outperform the performance I ’ve seen from the the like of the Hisense U7N and U8N — I watched some really toughened content , and it looks better than I expected on a screen of this size .
However , when watching content with film metric grain , whether digitally inserted or carried over during a digital transfer from actual film , that ’s where you notice the screen size if you are sit middling closely . This is true for every TV on the food market , where the caryopsis can seemingly take something away from the sharpness , while also tote up profundity and character . It ’s just that the grain is more obvious on a big covert if you are sitting very near to it . I have no complaints about how the 110 UX deal film grain , though .
I also lucked out with an exceptionally clean panel : There was zero perceivabledirty screen effect .
Passing the torture test
quiz after trial — even the torture trial — the 110 UX does extremely well . I feel like it rescue the experience you would expect from an extremely expensive telly , and borders on reference quality in most case . I ’m shocked at how good this television looks .
see a film likeMad Max : Fury Roadwhere the flames and Sunday reflection are intensely bright … I ’ve never seen them draw in off with such intensity level , even with dynamical tone function turned off . But release on dynamic timbre mapping and this goggle box really juices things up . In a glum elbow room , I ’d leave dynamic tone mapping off . But in a lustrous room ? It make water HDR content spill the beans in even the most ambitious of surroundings .
This television receiver is n’t just fun , it ’s downright impressive .
Sports are a delicacy to watch on this tv set . Even humble - quality cyclosis sport look surprisingly good — again “ from a screen of this size . ” When you blow even a 1080p cable television service or planet sign up to this size of it , the low morsel rate is pretty patent . Still , I was never distracted by excessive disturbance or blockiness or banding on this TV .
So , the tachygraphy is this : The 110 UX is an exceptional big - screen TV . It very much backs up its request price not just with size , but with a very high-pitched - tone image .
Ditching all the nerdy stuff , I had an absolute blast watching this TV and playing video games on it . Everything was a treat . It ’s bright , bright , punchy , and colorful , and everything I watched on it has look really dependable , not just self-aggrandizing .
This video is n’t just fun , though . It ’s downright telling . It is easily one of the most bragworthy television set I ’ve ever had the pleasure of experiencing and testing .
I experience some folks have business organization about length of service and dependableness , and it is an ongoing frustration that I am not able to do more long - term examination . But what I have noticed is that the last two generations of Hisense TVs I ’ve tested seem to be performing just as well now as the day I drive them . I think Hisense is direct some big stride in terms of build character and reliableness .
This boob tube is cleaner - await and has far more exact measurements than the TCL simulation . I ’m not sure that is going to be meaningful to many family — some would just opt to get five more diagonal in for about the same price . But if you ’re more of a purist ? There ’s no question that the 110 UX has tested better than the TCL QM891 G – which , frankly , I did n’t see coming .
For now , I ’ll acclaim Hisense for doing something unprecedented : creating a flagship - level TV at a massive screenland size . I ’ve never seen anything like it before .
For by and by : I ’m going to require that Hisense apply everything that makes the central processor , the build quality , and the overall performance capabilities so heavy , and hurry up with trickling it down to some of their more affordable models . I get that this is the moonshot cost - is - no - object TV . But now that we know you could do it , Hisense ? You ’re on the bait for bringing it to a larger audience . And if that is n’t a boastful teasing for CES , I do n’t get it on what is .
