TheiPhone 16 Prohas one of the best smartphone cameras you may buy , and it set a standard for everyone to beat , peculiarly regarding video . We ’ve already seenSamsung and OnePlus prove and fail to outwit Apple , and theGoogle Pixel 9 Prohas test that even it willfall somewhat myopic .
However , what happens when you count outside the U.S. ? Smartphones from Xiaomi , Vivo , and Oppo have fix television camera standard that put even the best in the U.S. to attaint . I was in Bali last month testing the iPhone 16 Pro tv camera against a new smartphone from Oppo .
The sis companionship of OnePlus , Oppo has alreadyshocked me with its unbelievable rapid growth capability on the Find X8 . The uncovering X8 Pro adds a 2d telephoto photographic camera — this time offering 6x visual rapid climb — but is it far beforehand of the iPhone 16 Pro ?
Oppo Find X8 Pro vs. iPhone 16 Pro: camera specs
f/1.78
f/1.6
f/2.2
f/2.0
f/2.8
5x optical rapid growth
f/2.6
3x optical rapid growth
f/4.3
6x optical rapid growth
f/1.9
As you’re able to see above , both phones have similar main and ultrawide cameras , but each troupe read a different glide path to telephotograph camera .
Apple has choose for a individual 5x telephoto crystalline lens and use in - sensor cropping to achieve the 2x “ telephoto ” it boost . This should mean it ’s fairly up to at lower zoom length , but 5x makes it more difficult to stay consistent between 2x and 5x .
Meanwhile , Oppo has also opted for in - detector cropping for a 2x telephoto , but it has paired this with two telephoto lenses offering 3x and 6x optic zoom . This apparatus — which is standardised to the one used in the Galaxy S24 Ultra — intend there are unlike lenses for the Find X8 Pro to flip-flop between at lower rapid climb duration , and this should entail it ’s more capable across the various focal lengths .
Does it return ? Let ’s find out !
Low-light and night photography
Low - light-headed photography is one of the most challenging tests of any smartphone camera , and this trial proves exactly why . While the Oppo breakthrough X8 Pro extradite well colors and light reproduction in the 2d sample , I opt the iPhone photo in the first scene thanks to better overall light counterbalance .
Both phones perform as well in this examination , both in terms of color reproduction and overall detail . I expect the iPhone to be more or less worse , and when viewed on each display , the Find X8 Pro looked better .
Pets and people
I ’ve been a big fan of Samsung ’s cameras for many years thanks to the redundant saturation applied in post - processing , and it ’s why I prefer the Find X8 Pro camera in the second photo . However , despite Oppo bear an exceptional camera for pet photo , the iPhone 16 Pro takes a much better overall hombre photograph as there ’s more particular in the eyes , and the colouration are more representative .
The first photo here was a playfulness trial run as it helped showcase how each speech sound handles a fit with vibrant colors and particular . It ’s a very close battle , but the Find X8 Pro just beats the iPhone 16 professional , and this continues into the 2d photo . A recurring theme in this equivalence — and my overall experience with the iPhone 16 Pro — is that it can sometimes be more washed out than the competition .
Which is better for portraits?
This is the ultimate test of any smartphone camera : how do you handle pilus flying in the lead while traveling at more than 20 miles per hour on an open - top boat ? Now , these are n’t direct comparisons as each phone captures portraits at varying degrees of craw , but I ca n’t get over the discovery X8 Pro in the second photo : the contingent captured in the hair is incredible , specially considering the abrasive shot conditions .
Of naturally , it ’s about more than just one sample distribution , so how about when the subject has little or no hairsbreadth that ’s move in the lead ? In the first photo , the Find X8 professional entrance all the finer details in the hair , but the overhead sun result in a less vibrant and more wash - out photograph of me in the 2nd exercise set .
The fight to be the zoom king
The Find X8 Pro should appeal to anyone who ’s look for a capable zoom photographic camera , and this was the trial I was extremely excited about . Now , it ’s deserving note that the iPhone 16 Pro only has one telephotograph camera , and the Find X8 Pro has two , so by nature , the Oppo tv camera should be much better at higher zoom lengths . However , is it a snug engagement otherwise ?
Both phones are most on par with each other regarding ultrawide camera spectacles , but the iPhone 16 Pro has slightly better color skill . However , this is n’t specific to just one crystalline lens on the Find X8 professional , with Oppo ’s algorithm essay to be slightly discrepant in its overall photos . The same experience continues through to the 1x photos , with the iPhone 16 Pro capturing a more enjoyable overall photo .
Despite the duller range of a function , the discovery X8 Pro is good at the bigger soar lengths , and there ’s more detail captured in both of these zoom pictures . The 2d image specially shows the difference between the two , although it is certainly closer than I had expected going into this equivalence .
We ’ve heard a lot about smartphone camera and their zoom or low - light capabilities , but most companies do n’t like to elevate humble - light rapid growth . This run shows why and how different the zoom capability of these two gadget are . There ’s no contest here : the Find X8 Pro screw up the iPhone out of the water , which suffers from the lense flare we ’ve all seen on iPhone photos in low light source .
How about in daytime ? These two photos arguably encompass the integral camera experience between these two machine . The OPPO Find X8 has more point and a more or less darker tone of voice , while the iPhone 16 Pro has a bright figure of speech that look slimly well but does n’t stand up to as much scrutiny .
The battle for overall camera supremacy
As we ’ve seen antecedently in this comparability , the iPhone 16 Pro captures photo that are a little brighter . In some shots — both antecedently and to come — this works to its hurt , but in the face of the Hindu statues in the first figure of speech , the extra spark mean the whole prospect is well - lit . Meanwhile , the Find X8 Pro is darker in both photos , which serves it well in the second photograph but not in the first .
That same desire to produce a burnished photo well hinders the iPhone 16 Pro in the first photo . The harsh brightness of the overhead sun , coupled with a moving boat , means it ’s washed out and lacking detail , whereas the first photo shows the true capacity of the breakthrough X8 Pro ’s lightning crack feature .
The first photo here is another interesting exercise of dissimilar approach to color scientific discipline . The desire for a brighter photo means there ’s more item in the rocks from the iPhone 16 Pro , but it fall aside when it comes to the Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree in the background , while the Find X8 Pro is more well - labialize in both photos .
Neither is perfect , however , as the factual picture was similar to the kindling in the iPhone photo in the first pic but with the particular and lucidness from the discovery X8 Pro photo . Thankfully , a little editing can make the Find X8 Pro a better exposure overall , whereas there ’s no answer for the want of item on the iPhone picture .
The trend of how the iPhone handles firing again offend it here , with the uncovering X8 Pro proving to be considerably better in both color reproduction and point in both photos . In particular , both photos from the Find X8 Pro are nearly superposable to the actual shot .
How the Find X8 Pro surprised and frustrated me
The Find X8 Pro represents the unknown in smartphone tv camera . Sharing many of the same features as last year ’s Find X7 Ultra — albeit without a 1 - inch sensor — it has everything you need on paper for a versatile smartphone camera that can shoot at multiple focal length .
The iPhone 16 Pro has well less - capable computer hardware , but it has one extremely strong advantage over the Find X8 Pro : body . This means that while it consider deficient photos , they are consistent in their overall vividness science , while the breakthrough X8 Pro is more inconsistent .
This has proven to be a little frustrating , and the same exposure taken on the Find X8 Pro twice can have different processing , resulting in different photos . That allege , I ca n’t get over just how capable the Find X8 Pro photographic camera is , and while this comparison shows some of its capabilities , our fullOppo feel X8 Pro reviewhighlights why this is my new favorite smartphone tv camera .
