When it comes to background and laptop computer processor , the two biggest name in Ithiel Town are Intel and AMD . Qualcomm is making inroads , but if you desire bloom functioning , Intel and AMD make thebest processorsfor play and serious productiveness .
Still , it ’s not all sunshine and rainbows for these industry titans . AMD ’s most recentRyzen 9000 CPUswere met with a lukewarm response , but thenIntel ’s Core Ultra 200 - serieswere even less telling . It may be up toX3D CPUs and turbo modesto save the day .
Even with a few misstep , though , there ’s a lot going on in the contention between Intel and AMD , and we ’re here to bust it all down for you . From screen background to laptops , we have all of the detail on the most late chips from AMD and Intel , and how to pick your next ascent .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
AMD vs. Intel: a brief history
AMD and Intel are two of the most iconic names in personal computer construction , and for respectable cause . For decades , they ’ve been duking it out to offer the fast , most capable , and most characteristic - rich processors for gamers , casual web browsers , and professionals alike . They ’ve gone back and away a few time over the years , withAMD launching groundbreaking designsandIntel respond with revolutionary chipsof its own , but where Intel keep a strong grasp on flagship carrying out between 2005 and 2015 , AMD really turn thing around with the launching of its Ryzen processors .
Debuting in 2017 , these chips bring in the fight to Intel in a more spectacular manner than AMD had deal in over a decade , and ever since then , the contest has only increase . Today , Intel and AMD are cervix and cervix with their latest designs , offering the great C.P.U. performance we ’ve ever seen in mainstream components . The latest multiplication C.P.U. from both encampment scaled back on execution leaps in favour of efficiency advance , lowering power requirement dramatically across the plank .
Desktop processors: a price comparison
AMD and Intel both have all-embracing ranges of mainframe that are all well deserving considering when it comes to your next rise . The latest mainstream models areAMD ’s Ryzen 9000andIntel ’s 14th - genesis Raptor Lake .
These processor extend up to 24 cores , clock pep pill that have finally reached 6GHz , and more stash than even some of the firm CPUs of late generations could dream of . They ’re not dramatically faster than the premature , thirteenth - generation , though , keeping Intel ’s last - gen part still very relevant .
Here are all the in vogue mainstream CPUs from AMD and Intel :
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
AMD
Intel
We ’re focalise on the highlighting here . AMD and Intel have multiple other C.P.U. models , but these are the main touchstones . For instance , AMD has non - ten versions of the processor listed about , while Intel sell KF models that cut the integrated graphics for a slightly lower price .
AMD also volunteer a unique branch of its main processors design specifically for gaming , experience as 3D V - Cache CPUs . These include the 7950X3D and 7800X3D. These processor have extra cache bolted on to one of the core complex dies inside the buffalo chip , giving them a large cost increase in gambling power . It does mean bring down clock speeds , though , which impacts productivity public presentation in tour . AMD has n’t issue 3D V - Cache versions of its Ryzen 9000 central processing unit yet , so the7800X3D remains the king of gamingfor now . Look out for its replacement in November 2024 .
Intel and AMD also offer credible options with their last - generation Ryzen 7000 and 13th/14th generation , although those are n’t as fast and do n’t put up all of the latest feature film . Both also have very trashy budget options that can cost as little as $ 50 , but they ’re only recommendable for those build the most lightweight of microcomputer .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Intel will extend its latest Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 processors in the calendar month to come , while AMD is expected to debut a young - genesis of X3D CPUs in the very near future .
Which company makes the fastest processors?
Intel and AMD have excellent processors for gaming and productiveness tasks like video redaction and transcoding , but it ’s a little chip complicated about which ones are “ the best . ” At the time of writing , AMD ’s best productiveness processor are the latest - generation 9950X and 9900X , but its best CPU for gaming are the last - propagation 7800X3D and 7950X3D. While for Intel , its later - generation Core Ultra 200 CPUs , like the 285 K and 265 K , are very effective , but they turn a loss out in play carrying into action to most of Intel ’s last - generation counterparts , and they do n’t even beat the last generation in productivity across the table .
Intel and AMD CPUs achieve their several outcome in quite different ways , too . AMD ’s processor employ a exclusive computer architecture and sport cooccurring multi - threading to double up the corroborate ribbon count . So its top CPU , the 9950X , has 16 core and supports 32 threads . Intel ’s latest , on the other bridge player , use dual architecture and have no simultaneous multithreading . So the 285 K has eight performance cores , 16 efficiency core , for a total core count of 24 , and a maximal thread count of 24 .
The last - generation ( and still somewhat relevant ) Intel Core i9 - 14900 K has 24 meat ( 8 + 16 ) and supports up to 32 threads . AMD also has powerful last - gen check , especially the X3D model with their extra memory cache , for gaming .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Benchmarks for Intel ’s 285 K and 265 K were much more underwhelming andour latest reviewfound them impressive , but far from recommendable — especially in play and when pit against top mainframe from the last - multiplication .
The Core Ultra 265 K and 245 K are n’t much honest . Though more effective again , they just do n’t deliver generational performance uplift and often fall behind their last - gen counterparts from either companionship .
If this makes you more concerned in Intel ’s one-time central processing unit , that ’s a fairish idea , but you should also be aware ofthe instability issueson Intel ’s 13th - gen and 14th - gen mainframe . Intel has mostly solved the trouble , which was focused on the Core i9 - 13900 K and Core i9 - 14900 K mainly , through a firmware update . However , if you ’re concerned in grease one’s palms one of these processor , it ’s deserving keeping the unbalance in mind .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
You do n’t need to buy the best to get a cracking mainframe for play or piece of work , though . At a more low-priced Leontyne Price , Intel ’s Core i5 - 13600 K and 14600 K are some of the best strike for the buck CPUs of their generations , offer amazing gaming and productivity performance for a much gloomy price . AMD can compete on performance , and late price drops have made its 9600X and 9700X much more attractive alternative , especially afterrecent operation patches gave them a big hike .
If you ’re focus mainly on play , AMD ’s 3D V - Cache processors are arguably still the best of the bunch . you could see how they execute in ourRyzen 7 7800X3D reviewandRyzen 9 7950X3D review .
There are also elder - multiplication CPUs worth view , too . AMD ’s Ryzen 5000 serial publication are still very able processors , with its5800X3D being amazingly competitivewith even the latest and slap-up in games . It is a dead remnant for upgrades , though , as the Ryzen 7000 and 9000 need a whole new motherboard and memory configuration . The Intel twelfth - generation CPUs are great picks , too , with the 12600 K being another great standout in the midrange and a vindicated upgrade path to the 13th or 14th coevals when you want it .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Both companies also offer encompassing range of mountains of budget CPUs , though you ’ll be stick with the late generation for now . On Intel ’s side , there ’s the fantabulous quadruplet - nitty-gritty Core i3 - 12100F for around $ 80 , while AMD ’s six - heart and soul Ryzen 5 5500 is about $ 85 and offers comparable carrying into action in game .
Intel is likely your best option if you build a meretricious organization with no discrete graphic . Although AMD ’s Ryzen 7000 and 9000 CPUs have onboard graphics and AMD ’s premature - propagation APUs are relatively capable , they are n’t as affordable . You ’d spend $ 120 on a Ryzen 5 5600 chiliad or about $ 90 on an Intel Core i3 - 12100 .
As it stands now , the Core i9 - 14900 K is the fastest Intel CPU you may corrupt , particularly when it comes to gaming , while the 285 K is arguably the better central processor for productivity However , the Ryzen 9 9950X stands as potent rival if you need more powerful individual heart .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
High-end desktop processors
If you require to use your microcomputer for sound video recording editing at high resolutions or execute intensive TV transcoding or CAD oeuvre , you postulate mound of processing index across plenty of cores . The best mainstream central processing unit are nifty option for that , but if you need even more than the 24 cores of the 285 K , you might want to consider a high - destruction background ( HEDT ) CPU .
Although Intel does have HEDT CPUs , like the 18 - core Core i9 - 10980XE , they ’re all severely outdated and easily beaten by the late high-pitched - end mainstream CPUs . alternatively , if you need spare core and central processing unit power , AMD’sThreadripper Pro chain of Ryzen 7000 CPUsis your best wager .
AMD ’s Threadripper CPUs extend 24 , 32 , 64 , and even 96 magnetic core with funding for double that number of simultaneous thread , all while maintaining clock stop number as high as 5.1GHz . If your software can make use of all those supernumerary cores , AMD ’s Threadripper CPUs offer unparalleled performance outside of obscenely expensive server CPUs , well outgo the Intel competition . They also support a dandy number of PCI - Express lane — 144 versus just 44 on the Intel alternatives — make them more suited to larger storage array .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
You ’ll pay up to $ 10,000 for the 96 - essence 7995WX , but if you’re able to speed up your work and , therefore , realise more money by using one of these C.P.U. , it could be well worth it . You ’ll get 64 cores for half that , though , so verify your program can use whatever core count you ’re considering .
Laptop processors
The laptop computer marketplace is a unlike story . Most notebook you ’ll find are based on an Intel processor of various generation and integrated graphics , but AMD CPUs are growing more common .
In the face of Copilot+ laptops developed on Snapdragon CPUs , AMD and Intel both have fresh generations of CPU in laptops . AMD has its Ryzen AI 300 CPU , which you may see in action in ourZenBook S 16 review . They ’re based on the Zen 5 architecture just like Ryzen 9000 screen background CPUs , but AMD has a strong focal point on efficiency and AI carrying out .
Compared to last - gen Ryzen 7000 and 8000 chips , fresh Ryzen AI 300 CPUs do n’t offer a monumental performance extrusion . And compared to in high spirits - end potato chip found in laptops like theAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 , the new Ryzen AI 300 CPUs are actually slower . However , they can give nearly a full day of barrage life in a lean and light laptop , all while furnish strong performance .
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Intel’sLunar Lake CPUstake a similar approach . They adopt a hybrid architecture like Intel ’s desktop C.P.U. , but Intel says the efficient meat are the main driver of performance . Intel also ditched Hyper - Threading on its Lunar Lake chips , alternatively focus on an eight - substance figure that it carries across its integral range of chips .
Based on our other testing of these splintering , they are n’t quite as powerful as we expected . They misplace out compare to Ryzen AI 300 in in the buff performance , but Intel take a massive lead when it comes to battery life , sometimes even amaze theM3 MacBook Pro . Both Lunar Lake and Ryzen AI 300 turn in solid execution , but Intel ’s latest CPU are good for longer bombardment life while AMD has a slight sharpness in overall execution .
Should you buy AMD or Intel?
For workaday web browsing , watch Netflix , and answering electronic mail , Intel and AMD CPUs will give you excellent public presentation right on out of the box . There are sure project , though , where one company ’s alternative perform better than the others .
If you ’re looking to work with your central processor performing intensive multithreaded tasks like telecasting editing or transcoding or heavy multitasking activity with piles of web browser tabs open , AMD ’s laptop computer CPUs are the dissipated , but Intel ’s are penny-pinching behind and often offer better assault and battery biography .
On background , thing are a snatch different . AMD ’s late Ryzen 9000 CPUs reign supreme in carrying out , and offer more undifferentiated performance than Intel ’s 14th multiplication or its latest Core Ultra 200 range . Although Intel has some compelling option , you postulate a good reason to pick them over AMD at the clip of written material .
If you ’re expect to biz on your desktop , AMD ’s Ryzen 7800X3D is the king of the mound , offering flagship gaming performance at an affordable terms and incredible efficiency . The 7950X3D is worth deliberate if you use your play machine for work too . Intel ’s estimable gambling poker chip are its last - generation 13th and fourteenth generation conception , like the 14600 K , 14700 K , and 13900 K , but they seldom beat AMD ’s 3D V - Cache choice . When the Ryzen 9000X3D chips debut , they ’re likely to become the new performance kings .
If you ’re still timid which chip is best for you , check out our pathfinder onbuying a CPUfor more help .
