AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor . Although it ’s been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series , AMD now compares its CPU toIntel ’s Lunar Lake , and the benchmark are highly favorable for AMD’sbest processorfor thin - and - light laptops . allow ’s check off them out .

For starters , AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU come with 12 cores ( four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c gist ) and 24 thread , as well as 36 megabyte of combined stash . The maximum clock velocity tops out at 5.1GHz , and the processor offers a configurable thermal design great power ( TDP ) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile , the Intel chip sports eight cores ( four carrying into action essence and four efficiency core ) , eight threads , a max frequency of 4.8GHz , 12 MB of cache , and a TDP roam from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit ( NPU ) , and AMD scores a profits here too , as its NPU provide 50 trillion operations per 2d ( TOPS ) , while Intel ’s sits at 47 TOPS . It ’s a small difference , though .

Digging into the results , AMD compares the two CPUs in a issue of games , claim major wins across the control panel . AMD say that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is on average 75 % quicker than Intel , and we can see that in these test . Some titles , such asF1 24andForza Horizon 5show monumental gains of over 50 frames per 2d ( Federal Protective Service ) at 1080p on medium setting .

It ’s deserving noting that both laptop computer were running with all of the game - boosting technology available to each seller for this test . In the case of AMD , this include FSR 3 where applicable , as well as AMD ’s one - button game - boosting solution , AMD HYPR - RX . Next , AMD also compared aboriginal performance with FSR 3 and Intel ’s rival upscaler XeSS .

thing even out quite a bit when comparing native performance without any bells and whistles . Although the precise information is n’t available , it looks like the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Core Ultra 7 258V are fairly close in title of respect likeCyberpunk 2077 , Ghost of Tsushima , andF1 24 . Intel ’s native performance shoot ahead inHitman 3andMarvel ’s Spider - Man Remastered , while AMD obliterates it inCall of Duty : Black Ops 6 .

Of of course , everything looks different when you face at the portion of the benchmark that shows off the great power of FSR 3 versus XeSS . There ’s no competition : AMD ’s gaming tech winnings by a landslide in every title .

The last trial run compare the base edition of FSR and AMD ’s HYPR - RX . Intel sees a decent cost increase from enable FSR , which , unlike Nvidia ’s DLSS 3 , is available to GPUs from all vendors . AMD still leads by a large margin , although , like before , native performance is not that far apart .

The timing for these benchmarks is interesting , considering that both AMD Ryzen AI 300 series and Intel Lunar Lake have been out for a while . The Lunar Lake C.P.U. is also not quite the equivalent weight to the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 , which can excuse some of the performance interruption . irrespective , AMD ’s execution - further tech bodes well for thin - and - light devices .

We ’ve already seen the central processor in action at law in laptop such as theAsus Zenbook S 16 , where it did an telling problem . The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is also set to come out in a GMKtec mini - microcomputer — something akin to the Intel NUC — and in handhelds . Those devices , more than anything else , might largely benefit from what AMD is highlighting here , as without a discrete GPU , this type of technical school can really fall in ready to hand .