I recently review theAcer Swift 14 AI , a14 - inch laptopaimed at significantly better battery life than most Windows laptop . It deliver the goods , thanks in part to Intel ’s New Lunar Lake chipsets . Now , Acer wants to accomplish the same in a like , but not identical , laptop using Qualcomm ’s Snapdragon X — for less money .
The Swift Go 14 AI uses a larger higher - resolution display and a more aggressive aesthetic , and it , too , bid very adept battery lifespan that brings Windows a mountain closer to Apple ’s highly efficientMacBook Air M3 . It ’s not one of thebest laptop , but it ’s a very sound option for anyone wanting great battery spirit and good performance in a more low-priced parcel .
Specs and configuration
There ’s only one conformation of the Swift Go 14 AI , and it ’s only available at the Acer web store . It name for $ 1,000 but is currently on cut-rate sale for $ 800 , with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus chipset , 16 GB of RAM , a 1 TB SSD , and a 14.5 - in QHD+ IPS display .
On sale , that ’s an attractive monetary value for a well - configured laptop . you could opine that a 512 GB model would come in even modest if one were offered . A few Qualcomm laptops have come in around the same toll , such as theLenovo IdeaPad 5x 2 - in-1that ’s $ 895 with a lowly , lower - res FHD+ OLED display . TheAcer Swift 14 AIusing the Intel Lunar Lake chipset is considerably more expensive start at $ 1,200 with an FHD+ IPS video display . We ’ve encounter more premium options like the Surface Laptop 7th Edition add up in ataround this Leontyne Price when on cut-rate sale , but with less storage .
Design
The Swift Go 14 AI is essentially a chunkier version of the Swift 14 AI . It ’s around the same breadth and depth in spite of having a turgid display at 14.5 inches versus 14.0 inches . But , it ’s a bit thicker and heavier . It ’s also a more aggressive purpose , with great vent below the lid that hint at a higher performance laptop . Acer incorporated the same kind of reverse nick that Lenovo uses to keep the top bezel slim while avoiding Apple ’s display notch .
It ’s really not as attractive , and that goes double for some other recent 14 - in machines like theHP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14with its more elegant aesthetic . The Swift Go 14 AI has a sweeping breaking ball along the side , but that clangoring with the cheat lines on the rear of the flesh . Somehow , it does n’t flow as well as the production line on the Swift 14 AI .
The all - aluminum structure is just all right , with no bend , flexing , or twisting in the lid , keyboard deck , or bottom bod . That ’s common late , even in laptop well under $ 1,000 . I really ca n’t think of the last laptop computer I review that was n’t well - construct , and that let in the IdeaPad 5x 2 - in-1 that sometimes comes in at under $ 700 on sales agreement .
Keyboard and touchpad
The keyboard is just OK . The keycaps are just a flyspeck bit little than I like , while key spacing and the layout is comfortable . The switch are a petty spongey , while the Swift 14 AI has snapper switch and the OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 has a much better keyboard .
The touchpad is large enough and its mechanical invention works well enough . I do opt haptic touchpads like the best variant on Apple MacBooks , but we ’re not quite at a point in time where sub-$1,000 laptops are equipped with them . Unlike the Swift 14 AI , the Swift Go 14 AI does n’t have a touch display . That may not count to that many people . The Swift Go 14 AI touchpad has an LED that lights up when AI features are being used , but I did n’t see it hire during my examination .
Webcam and connectivity
Connectivity is okay . There are two USB4 port that provide degraded connectivity , and two legacy porthole . There ’s no SD add-in reader , which I ’m view on few laptops . Wireless connectivity is fully up - to - day of the month .
The webcam is a 144op version , so high - Re than the novel measure of 1080p . The Qualcomm chipset has a fast neural processing unit of measurement ( NPU ) at 45 tera operations per second ( pinnacle ) , exceeding the Microsoft Copilot+ prerequisite of 40 peak . That mean the Swift Go 14 AI will endure all the Copilot+ AI features on - equipment with good efficiency and performance .
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42 - 100 is an 8 - core limb - base chipset that run at 3.2GHz with a single - magnetic core cost increase to 3.4GHz , liken to the other common chipset , the 12 - core Snapdragon X Elite that runs at 3.4GHz with a dual - core boost to 4.0GHz . That makes it slower , but as we ’ll see is still quite fast and , in fact , quicker than the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V that ’s part of the Lunar Lake lineup . The Snapdragon X Plus has an Adreno GPU that runs at 1.7 TFLOPS , a lot tedious than the Elite Adreno that ’s 3.8 TFLOPS or fast .
In our bench mark , the Swift Go 14 AI does well in CPU - intensive task . It ’s faster than each of the Lunar Lake laptops but slower than theHP OmniBook Xwith the Snapdragon X Elite . It ’s slowest in its GPU carrying out , fall well behind the leaders here . TheMacBook Air M3is faster across the board in exclusive - nitty-gritty and slightly behind in the Cinebench R24 multi - core test .
Battery life
The stress of both Qualcomm and Intel recently has been on efficiency . window laptops had fallen well behind Apple ’s Silicon MacBooks in battery sprightliness , and that ’s been changing .
The Swift Go 14 AI does very well in both our web browsing and video looping benchmarks , promising multiday bombardment life unless you ’re work the chipset particularly intemperately . That ’s Acer ’s second winnings , as the Swift 14 AI with Intel Lunar Lake also stood out .
The MacBook Air M3 still looks pretty safe , but it ’s no longer true that you ca n’t get Windows and beneficial battery life at the same sentence .
Display and audio
The Swift Go 14 AI has one video display option , a 14.5 - in QHD+ ( 2560 x 1440 ) IPS showing that runs at up to 120Hz . That ’s an improvement over the 14.0 - inch FHD+ ( 1920 x 1200 ) IPS video display in the Swift 14 AI that maxes out at 60Hz . Subjectively , I did enjoy the extra bite in the Swift Go 14 AI , and colors and brightness were unspoiled .
I ’ve been commenting lately that displays across the board have gotten a lot in effect in the last few year . Not only are there more OLED displays available at low prices but IPS display have father brighter with proficient contrast and wider , more accurate colors . The Swift Go 14 AI ’s panel is in line with that course . It ’s promising at 407 nit , well above our 300 - nit criterion that we really involve to adjust . Contrast is also good at 1,270:1 , surmount our 1,000:1 room access — every presentation I ’ve critique in the last couple of years is eminent than that , so it need adjusting as well . coloration were reasonably wide at 100 % of sRGB , 80 % of AdobeRGB , and 82 % of DCI - P3 , and accuracy was good at a DeltaE of 1.61 ( less than 2.0 is great for productivity but not optimum for creative applications ) .
This is a adept presentation with decent sharpness , very good performance , and probably represents a proficient trade - off between battery life and caliber .
The sound is n’t all that great , though . It uses two downward - firing speakers that deliver speech sound that ’s good enough for the occasional YouTube video or video call , but for anything else , a pair of earpiece is recommend .
Acer offers up another long-lasting 14-inch machine
The Swift Go 14 AI is n’t the best - look laptop around . But it ’s beautifully price , peculiarly if you’re able to get it on cut-rate sale . At just $ 800 , you get a well - built and fully - configured laptop with a very good IPS showing .
But perhaps more significant , it ’s also fast for productiveness user and it gets fantabulous battery life story . You ’ll want to make certain your apps are supported on Windows on Arm , but that ’s less of an number than it ’s been in the past tense . If you may expect past the lackluster design , the Swift Go 14 AI is easy to urge .
